CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

TJXvsCOST

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between TJX and COST.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, COST demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, TJX exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$47.77M.

Conversely, the executive board of COST is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$34.86M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

TJX

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$47.77MAll-Time Baseline: -$319.86M
Notable Recent Mover
Herrman Ernie
SOLD$28.65M
Active Insiders13
Last Filing2026.06.11
Deep Dive TJX Flow

COST

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$34.86MAll-Time Baseline: -$303.44M
Notable Recent Mover
Klauer James C
SOLD$5.33M
Active Insiders24
Last Filing2026.06.23
Deep Dive COST Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, TJX or COST?

COST currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

>How do TJX and COST insider sentiments compare?

TJX registers BEARISH sentiment with $-47.77M net flow, while COST is BEARISH with $-34.86M.

>Are executives at TJX or COST more bullish?

Executive buying intensity is 0% at TJX versus 0% at COST, based on open-market purchase share of total insider activity.

Related_Analysis