CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

RFvsACGL

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between RF and ACGL.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, RF demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, RF exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$2.06M.

Conversely, the executive board of ACGL is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$50.66M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

RF

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 5%Sell 95%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$2.06MAll-Time Baseline: -$41.83M
Notable Recent Mover
Ritter William D.
SOLD$1.04M
Active Insiders17
Last Filing2026.05.07
Deep Dive RF Flow

ACGL

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 1%Sell 99%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$50.66MAll-Time Baseline: -$291.78M
Notable Recent Mover
PASQUESI JOHN M
SOLD$29.30M
Active Insiders11
Last Filing2026.06.11
Deep Dive ACGL Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Are executives at RF or ACGL more bullish?

Executive buying intensity is 5% at RF versus 1% at ACGL, based on open-market purchase share of total insider activity.

>Which stock has more insider buying, RF or ACGL?

Based on the last 30 days of SEC Form 4 filings, RF shows higher buying conviction from its executives.

>Is it a better signal to follow RF or ACGL insiders?

Insider sentiment for RF is currently BEARISH, while ACGL is BEARISH. Monitoring net capital flow is essential for determining the strength of these signals.

Related_Analysis