CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

PGRvsWAFD

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between PGR and WAFD.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, WAFD demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, PGR exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$39.51M.

Conversely, the executive board of WAFD is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$1.93M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

PGR

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$39.51MAll-Time Baseline: -$213.95M
Notable Recent Mover
Griffith Susan Patricia
SOLD$14.97M
Active Insiders23
Last Filing2026.06.24
Deep Dive PGR Flow

WAFD

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 5%Sell 95%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$1.93MAll-Time Baseline: -$15.67M
Notable Recent Mover
Cooper Cathy E
SOLD$822K
Active Insiders18
Last Filing2026.04.24
Deep Dive WAFD Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Is it a better signal to follow PGR or WAFD insiders?

Insider sentiment for PGR is currently BEARISH, while WAFD is BEARISH. Monitoring net capital flow is essential for determining the strength of these signals.

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, PGR or WAFD?

WAFD currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

>How do PGR and WAFD insider sentiments compare?

PGR registers BEARISH sentiment with $-39.51M net flow, while WAFD is BEARISH with $-1.93M.

Related_Analysis