CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

IRvsACM

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between IR and ACM.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, ACM demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, IR exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$64.02M.

Conversely, the executive board of ACM is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$27.99M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

IR

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$64.02MAll-Time Baseline: -$3.35B
Notable Recent Mover
Reynal Vicente
SOLD$52.89M
Active Insiders9
Last Filing2026.04.13
Deep Dive IR Flow

ACM

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 2%Sell 98%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$27.99MAll-Time Baseline: -$473.35M
Notable Recent Mover
Rudd Troy
SOLD$19.04M
Active Insiders11
Last Filing2026.06.16
Deep Dive ACM Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, IR or ACM?

ACM currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

>How do IR and ACM insider sentiments compare?

IR registers BEARISH sentiment with $-64.02M net flow, while ACM is BEARISH with $-27.99M.

>Are executives at IR or ACM more bullish?

Executive buying intensity is 0% at IR versus 2% at ACM, based on open-market purchase share of total insider activity.

Related_Analysis