CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

GSvsCME

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between GS and CME.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, CME demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, GS exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$75.24M.

Conversely, the executive board of CME is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$26.48M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

GS

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$75.24MAll-Time Baseline: -$178.27M
Notable Recent Mover
Ruemmler Kathryn H.
SOLD$22.50M
Active Insiders8
Last Filing2026.05.14
Deep Dive GS Flow

CME

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 2%Sell 98%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$26.48MAll-Time Baseline: -$182.88M
Notable Recent Mover
DUFFY TERRENCE A
SOLD$17.19M
Active Insiders30
Last Filing2026.06.25
Deep Dive CME Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which stock has more insider buying, GS or CME?

Based on the last 30 days of SEC Form 4 filings, CME shows higher buying conviction from its executives.

>Is it a better signal to follow GS or CME insiders?

Insider sentiment for GS is currently BEARISH, while CME is BEARISH. Monitoring net capital flow is essential for determining the strength of these signals.

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, GS or CME?

CME currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

Related_Analysis