CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

COSTvsDECK

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between COST and DECK.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, DECK demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, COST exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$34.86M.

Conversely, the executive board of DECK is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$1.68M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

COST

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$34.86MAll-Time Baseline: -$303.44M
Notable Recent Mover
Klauer James C
SOLD$5.33M
Active Insiders24
Last Filing2026.06.23
Deep Dive COST Flow

DECK

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 10%Sell 90%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$1.68MAll-Time Baseline: -$208.49M
Notable Recent Mover
Ogbechie Angela
SOLD$768K
Active Insiders17
Last Filing2026.06.01
Deep Dive DECK Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which stock has more insider buying, COST or DECK?

Based on the last 30 days of SEC Form 4 filings, DECK shows higher buying conviction from its executives.

>Is it a better signal to follow COST or DECK insiders?

Insider sentiment for COST is currently BEARISH, while DECK is BEARISH. Monitoring net capital flow is essential for determining the strength of these signals.

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, COST or DECK?

DECK currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

Related_Analysis