CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

CMEvsAFG

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between CME and AFG.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, AFG demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, CME exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$26.48M.

Conversely, the executive board of AFG is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$2.51M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

CME

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 2%Sell 98%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$26.48MAll-Time Baseline: -$182.88M
Notable Recent Mover
DUFFY TERRENCE A
SOLD$17.19M
Active Insiders30
Last Filing2026.06.25
Deep Dive CME Flow

AFG

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$2.51MAll-Time Baseline: -$1.35B
Notable Recent Mover
Thompson David Lawrence Jr
SOLD$1.54M
Active Insiders15
Last Filing2026.06.24
Deep Dive AFG Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, CME or AFG?

AFG currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

>How do CME and AFG insider sentiments compare?

CME registers BEARISH sentiment with $-26.48M net flow, while AFG is BEARISH with $-2.51M.

>Are executives at CME or AFG more bullish?

Executive buying intensity is 2% at CME versus 0% at AFG, based on open-market purchase share of total insider activity.

Related_Analysis