CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

CIvsISRG

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between CI and ISRG.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, ISRG demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, CI exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$83.32M.

Conversely, the executive board of ISRG is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$9.42M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

CI

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 1%Sell 99%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$83.32MAll-Time Baseline: -$476.45M
Notable Recent Mover
Cordani David
SOLD$67.29M
Active Insiders21
Last Filing2026.06.12
Deep Dive CI Flow

ISRG

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$9.42MAll-Time Baseline: -$906.51M
Notable Recent Mover
Curet Myriam
SOLD$3.59M
Active Insiders19
Last Filing2026.06.12
Deep Dive ISRG Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, CI or ISRG?

ISRG currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

>How do CI and ISRG insider sentiments compare?

CI registers BEARISH sentiment with $-83.32M net flow, while ISRG is BEARISH with $-9.42M.

>Are executives at CI or ISRG more bullish?

Executive buying intensity is 1% at CI versus 0% at ISRG, based on open-market purchase share of total insider activity.

Related_Analysis