CROSS_ENTITY_ANALYSIS

CBTvsIR

Side-by-side evaluation of corporate insider sentiment. Analyzing comparative capital accumulation and liquidation trends between CBT and IR.

Comparative_Dossier

When evaluating the structural capital flows, CBT demonstrates a relatively stronger internal accumulation profile (or less aggressive liquidation). Currently, CBT exhibits a bearish posture among its C-Suite, generating a recent net capital flow of -$21.23M.

Conversely, the executive board of IR is maintaining a bearish stance, logging a recent net internal flow of -$64.02M. Monitoring these short-term divergences against their all-time baselines provides a probabilistic edge in identifying sector leadership.

CBT

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$21.23MAll-Time Baseline: -$82.29M
Notable Recent Mover
Keohane Sean D
SOLD$11.67M
Active Insiders19
Last Filing2026.01.08
Deep Dive CBT Flow

IR

RECENT MOMENTUM MODEL
Buy 0%Sell 100%
Recent Net Capital Flow-$64.02MAll-Time Baseline: -$3.35B
Notable Recent Mover
Reynal Vicente
SOLD$52.89M
Active Insiders9
Last Filing2026.04.13
Deep Dive IR Flow

Execute_New_Analysis

VS

Cross_Reference :: Sector_Related_Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

>Which stock has more insider buying, CBT or IR?

Based on the last 30 days of SEC Form 4 filings, IR shows higher buying conviction from its executives.

>Is it a better signal to follow CBT or IR insiders?

Insider sentiment for CBT is currently BEARISH, while IR is BEARISH. Monitoring net capital flow is essential for determining the strength of these signals.

>Which company shows stronger net insider flow, CBT or IR?

CBT currently leads with stronger net insider capital flow over the recent reporting period.

Related_Analysis